|
GlacialTech 5610 Igloo

GlacialTech has been on a rampage as of late,
launching several new CPU coolers. Today we look at one of the
first designs, the 5610 Igloo PWM and the 5610 Igloo Silent. The 5610
lineup enters in as part of the value segment for Intel CPUs.
Just because a cooler is cheap, however, does not mean that it can't
perform, so we are going to do our best to determine if this cooler
is worth a few of your hard earned dollars.
Features and Specifications:
| Socket Type |
T |
Intel® CPU Clock Speed
(max.) |
Pentium D 3.4 GHz (95W)
Prescott 3.4 GHz (84W)
Intel® Core 2 Duo E6700 2.66 GHz (65W)
Intel® Core 2 Duo E4300 1.8 GHz (65W)
Intel® Core 2 Extreme X6800 2.93 GHz (75W)
Intel® Core 2 Extreme Processor QX6800 (130W)
All Celeron |
| Cooler Dimension (mm)
|
99 x 66 x 110 |
| Cooler Weight (gram)
|
373 |
| Fan: |
|
| Bearing
Type |
1B1S |
| Rated Voltage |
DC 12 V |
| Dimension (mm) |
80 x 80 x 20 |
| Speed (RPM) |
Silent: 1,800 (±10%)
PWM: 3,200 (±10%) |
| Airflow (CFM) |
Silent: 30.8 (±10%)
PWM: 51.3 (±10%) |
| Noise (dBA) |
Silent : 19dBA
PWM: 34dBA |
| Interface Material
|
High Efficiency Thermal Compound |
First Impressions:

At first look, the 5610 series coolers appear
diminutive in size compared to the many monsters on the market
today. It is almost easy to forget that "normal" size coolers
still exist. If you look closer, you will see that the
only difference between the PWM and the Silent model is the fan
connector. The Silent version utilizes the older 3-pin style
connector while the PWM model uses the newer 4-pin connector.
In every other aspect the two coolers are identical.

Here is a close-up of the side. As you can
see, this is not a very wide heatsink either. Two heatpipes bend
to make a U-formation from one side to the other.

Above is a picture of the rear end. Here we
can see one of the unique design features of the PWM. Instead
of using horizontal fins all the way down to the base, the 5610 has
an almost old school looking vertical set mounted to the base, with the
more modern horizontal fins above it. As you can see, the fins
are very thin and are packed very tightly.

Finally, we have the base of the 5610. The
base is mirror finished with a layer of thermal interface material
already applied for your convenience. The paste appears to be
thicker than Arctic Silver 5. Also, notice the mounting
bracket. Each corner has a screw held in place by a plastic
sheath. Not pictured is a fairly standard backplate to go
under the motherboard.
Installation:

Installation on the 5610 series is pretty straight
forward. Unfortunately, because Socket 775 has neither a
bracket or a backplate, even basic heatsink installs require
motherboard removal. This is not a ding against GlacialTech
however, but a ding against Intel's poor choice in design. One
thing the GlacialTech backplate has going for it is the fact that
the backplate itself is threaded. This means no nuts to try
and hold in place while you try and screw in the heatsink.

Four screws, and this puppy is in place. As
always, tighten down in opposite corners first, just as if you were
changing a spare tire. Can't get much easier than that.

GlacialTech warns in their documentation that good
case airflow is vital for adequate cooling for higher end CPUs.
Thank goodness we just happen to have a 120mm fan in the area.
Testing:
| CPU: |
Q6600 @ 2.4GHz, 1.225V |
| Motherboard: |
DFI Lan Party P35-T2R |
| GPU: |
OCZ 8800GTX, 648MHz-1674MHz-1050MHz |
| RAM: |
4x1GB Crucial Ballistix, DDR2-1066, 2.2V |
| Case: |
Danger Den Torture Rack |
| Sound: |
X-Fi XtremeMusic |
| Hard Drives: |
1x500GB
Seagate Barracuda
2x150GB Raptor X |
To test both flavors of the 5610, we will be using
the above rig as a testbed. We will be comparing performance
to the stock Intel cooler that has Arctic Silver 5 applied for
the TIM. For each test, there will be five minutes of idle
time followed by 15 minutes of full load on the CPU. Idle is
defined as sitting on the Windows Vista desktop, while the load is
generated by Prime 95 version 25.4, using Large FFTs. Temps
are captured by SpeedFan 4.34 beta 36 in 3 second increments,
looking at the external CPU temp as well as Core 0.
Stock:

First off is our stock Intel heatsink results.
If there is one thing that has never changed, it is that the stock
Intel heatsinks have always been good at being one thing: funky
looking paperweights. They surely have not been good heatsinks.
In this case, the CPU idles at around 32C and loads around 60C,
while the Core 0 temp idles at 46C and loads all the way up to 72C
or so. Ouch.
Igloo Silent:

Next up is the Igloo 5610 Silent. Locked in
at 1800 RPMs, the Silent version has no fan control. That
didn't stop it from beating out the stock Intel by a good margin,
however. With the CPU idling at 30C and loading at 51C, and
the Core idling at 44C and loading at 63C, occasionally spiking to
65C, the "Silent" version still knocks off the stock cooler by
roughly 9C. The cooler was completely silent, to boot.
Not bad.
Igloo 5610 PWM:

Finally, we have the 5610 PWM model. This
can be independently fan controlled by the motherboard to provide a
greater control over the cooling. At full bore, the CPU idles
at 29C and loads at 44C, while the Core idles at 42C and loads at
57C. Not too shabby at all, the PWM beats the Silent out by
about 7C and the stock cooler by about 16C. This is not
without cost, however, as the fan at 3200 RPM is clearly audible,
and is definitely more than my comfort level.
Conclusion:
Looking at the size and price of the 5610 series,
I clearly was not expecting it to take home any big time performance
wins away from the likes of Thermalright, CoolerMaster or Scythe.
Nonetheless, the compact size of the 5610 belies the performance
capabilities of these units. For a small fee of $20, you can
have a quality heatsink that clearly does a better job than the
stock unit. Just don't expect to hit any insane overclocks.
If you compare the 5610 next to the stock heatsink, the 5610 stands
taller but takes up less real estate on the motherboard, though for
all intents it is practically the same size. Because of the
size, silence, and price, I have decided to give the heatsink a
"better than average" rating of 4.0.
Pros:
Cons:
Note: Club Overclocker is
now using a new rating system based on a score of 1 to 5.
Please go to our rating system page for more information.
|
 |
| Performance: |
3 out of 5 | Innovation: |
4 out of 5 | Quality: |
4 out of 5 | Stability: |
N/A |
| Aesthetics: |
3 out of 5 | Software/Drivers Pack: |
N/A |
Overclocking: |
N/A |
|
Value: |
4 out of 5 |
|
 |
 |
 | Project Skill Level (5 being most difficult) |
2
out of 5 |

|